Select Design
You can update Firmname, Logo, Profession, Mobile, Email, Address from Profile.
High Court Quashes Tax Demand Over Email Error
R. Soundararajan & Co. v. Deputy Tax Officer
07-08-2023
W.P.(MD)NO. 19092 OF 2023 W.M.P(MD) NOS. 15838 & 15841 OF 2023
Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Facts:
The petitioner, R. Soundararajan & Co., contested an order dated April 27, 2022, demanding taxes under GST laws.
The order indicated the petitioners alleged GST liabilities, but they claimed to have overpaid their taxes.
The petitioner had not been granted a personal hearing, and the revenue department had sent a notice to the wrong email address not belonging to the petitioner.
Decision: The court determined that sending the notice to the wrong email address constituted a clear violation of natural justice. Consequently, the court quashed the order dated April 27, 2022. The court instructed the petitioner to submit objections within three weeks, and the revenue department was directed to provide a personal hearing, issue a speaking order, and complete the process within eight weeks.
Decision: The court determined that sending the notice to the wrong email address constituted a clear violation of natural justice. Consequently, the court quashed the order dated April 27, 2022. The court instructed the petitioner to submit objections within three weeks, and the revenue department was directed to provide a personal hearing, issue a speaking order, and complete the process within eight weeks.
Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
High Court Quashes Tax Demand Over Email Error
R. Soundararajan & Co. v. Deputy Tax Officer
07-08-2023
W.P.(MD)NO. 19092 OF 2023 W.M.P(MD) NOS. 15838 & 15841 OF 2023
Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Facts:
The petitioner, R. Soundararajan & Co., contested an order dated April 27, 2022, demanding taxes under GST laws.
The order indicated the petitioners alleged GST liabilities, but they claimed to have overpaid their taxes.
The petitioner had not been granted a personal hearing, and the revenue department had sent a notice to the wrong email address not belonging to the petitioner.
Decision: The court determined that sending the notice to the wrong email address constituted a clear violation of natural justice. Consequently, the court quashed the order dated April 27, 2022. The court instructed the petitioner to submit objections within three weeks, and the revenue department was directed to provide a personal hearing, issue a speaking order, and complete the process within eight weeks.
Decision: The court determined that sending the notice to the wrong email address constituted a clear violation of natural justice. Consequently, the court quashed the order dated April 27, 2022. The court instructed the petitioner to submit objections within three weeks, and the revenue department was directed to provide a personal hearing, issue a speaking order, and complete the process within eight weeks.
Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Sample High Court Quashes Tax Demand Over Email Error
R. Soundararajan & Co. v. Deputy Tax Officer
07-08-2023
W.P.(MD)NO. 19092 OF 2023 W.M.P(MD) NOS. 15838 & 15841 OF 2023
Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Facts:
The petitioner, R. Soundararajan & Co., contested an order dated April 27, 2022, demanding taxes under GST laws.
The order indicated the petitioners alleged GST liabilities, but they claimed to have overpaid their taxes.
The petitioner had not been granted a personal hearing, and the revenue department had sent a notice to the wrong email address not belonging to the petitioner.
Decision: The court determined that sending the notice to the wrong email address constituted a clear violation of natural justice. Consequently, the court quashed the order dated April 27, 2022. The court instructed the petitioner to submit objections within three weeks, and the revenue department was directed to provide a personal hearing, issue a speaking order, and complete the process within eight weeks.
Decision: The court determined that sending the notice to the wrong email address constituted a clear violation of natural justice. Consequently, the court quashed the order dated April 27, 2022. The court instructed the petitioner to submit objections within three weeks, and the revenue department was directed to provide a personal hearing, issue a speaking order, and complete the process within eight weeks.
Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Sample High Court Quashes Tax Demand Over Email Error
R. Soundararajan & Co. v. Deputy Tax Officer
07-08-2023
W.P.(MD)NO. 19092 OF 2023 W.M.P(MD) NOS. 15838 & 15841 OF 2023
Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Facts:
The petitioner, R. Soundararajan & Co., contested an order dated April 27, 2022, demanding taxes under GST laws.
The order indicated the petitioners alleged GST liabilities, but they claimed to have overpaid their taxes.
The petitioner had not been granted a personal hearing, and the revenue department had sent a notice to the wrong email address not belonging to the petitioner.
Decision: The court determined that sending the notice to the wrong email address constituted a clear violation of natural justice. Consequently, the court quashed the order dated April 27, 2022. The court instructed the petitioner to submit objections within three weeks, and the revenue department was directed to provide a personal hearing, issue a speaking order, and complete the process within eight weeks.
Decision: The court determined that sending the notice to the wrong email address constituted a clear violation of natural justice. Consequently, the court quashed the order dated April 27, 2022. The court instructed the petitioner to submit objections within three weeks, and the revenue department was directed to provide a personal hearing, issue a speaking order, and complete the process within eight weeks.
Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Sample High Court Quashes Tax Demand Over Email Error
R. Soundararajan & Co. v. Deputy Tax Officer
07-08-2023
W.P.(MD)NO. 19092 OF 2023 W.M.P(MD) NOS. 15838 & 15841 OF 2023
Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Facts:
The petitioner, R. Soundararajan & Co., contested an order dated April 27, 2022, demanding taxes under GST laws.
The order indicated the petitioners alleged GST liabilities, but they claimed to have overpaid their taxes.
The petitioner had not been granted a personal hearing, and the revenue department had sent a notice to the wrong email address not belonging to the petitioner.
Decision: The court determined that sending the notice to the wrong email address constituted a clear violation of natural justice. Consequently, the court quashed the order dated April 27, 2022. The court instructed the petitioner to submit objections within three weeks, and the revenue department was directed to provide a personal hearing, issue a speaking order, and complete the process within eight weeks.
Decision: The court determined that sending the notice to the wrong email address constituted a clear violation of natural justice. Consequently, the court quashed the order dated April 27, 2022. The court instructed the petitioner to submit objections within three weeks, and the revenue department was directed to provide a personal hearing, issue a speaking order, and complete the process within eight weeks.
Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Sample High Court Quashes Tax Demand Over Email Error
R. Soundararajan & Co. v. Deputy Tax Officer
07-08-2023
W.P.(MD)NO. 19092 OF 2023 W.M.P(MD) NOS. 15838 & 15841 OF 2023
Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Facts:
The petitioner, R. Soundararajan & Co., contested an order dated April 27, 2022, demanding taxes under GST laws.
The order indicated the petitioners alleged GST liabilities, but they claimed to have overpaid their taxes.
The petitioner had not been granted a personal hearing, and the revenue department had sent a notice to the wrong email address not belonging to the petitioner.
Decision: The court determined that sending the notice to the wrong email address constituted a clear violation of natural justice. Consequently, the court quashed the order dated April 27, 2022. The court instructed the petitioner to submit objections within three weeks, and the revenue department was directed to provide a personal hearing, issue a speaking order, and complete the process within eight weeks.
Decision: The court determined that sending the notice to the wrong email address constituted a clear violation of natural justice. Consequently, the court quashed the order dated April 27, 2022. The court instructed the petitioner to submit objections within three weeks, and the revenue department was directed to provide a personal hearing, issue a speaking order, and complete the process within eight weeks.
Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Sample 