'

Select Design

You can update Firmname, Logo, Profession, Mobile, Email, Address from Profile.

GST Decision by HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Refund Rejection Overturned: BRCs Not Essential for Export ITC Claims
logo

Rajiv Sharma HUF v. Union of India

26-07-2024

W.P. (C) NO. 9381 OF 2023

Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Facts: Rajiv Sharma HUF applied for a refund of accumulated ITC on exports. The application was rejected due to missing BRCs and incomplete supplier ledger and bank statements. The petitioner contested that BRCs were not required and faced rejection over incomplete ledger accounts.
Decision: The court ruled that BRCs are not mandatory for export refund claims. The court found the rejection based on BRCs and Rule 96B was incorrect. The matter was remanded to re-evaluate whether the payments for inward supplies were made properly.
Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Update

Get above Design
GST Decision by HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Refund Rejection Overturned: BRCs Not Essential for Export ITC Claims
logo

Rajiv Sharma HUF v. Union of India

26-07-2024

W.P. (C) NO. 9381 OF 2023

Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Facts: Rajiv Sharma HUF applied for a refund of accumulated ITC on exports. The application was rejected due to missing BRCs and incomplete supplier ledger and bank statements. The petitioner contested that BRCs were not required and faced rejection over incomplete ledger accounts.
Decision: The court ruled that BRCs are not mandatory for export refund claims. The court found the rejection based on BRCs and Rule 96B was incorrect. The matter was remanded to re-evaluate whether the payments for inward supplies were made properly.
Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Update Logo Sample
Sample

Get above Design

GST Decision by HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Refund Rejection Overturned: BRCs Not Essential for Export ITC Claims
logo

Rajiv Sharma HUF v. Union of India

26-07-2024

W.P. (C) NO. 9381 OF 2023

Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Facts: Rajiv Sharma HUF applied for a refund of accumulated ITC on exports. The application was rejected due to missing BRCs and incomplete supplier ledger and bank statements. The petitioner contested that BRCs were not required and faced rejection over incomplete ledger accounts.
Decision: The court ruled that BRCs are not mandatory for export refund claims. The court found the rejection based on BRCs and Rule 96B was incorrect. The matter was remanded to re-evaluate whether the payments for inward supplies were made properly.
Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Update Logo Sample
Sample

Get above Design
GST Decision by HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Refund Rejection Overturned: BRCs Not Essential for Export ITC Claims
logo

Rajiv Sharma HUF v. Union of India

26-07-2024

W.P. (C) NO. 9381 OF 2023

Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Facts: Rajiv Sharma HUF applied for a refund of accumulated ITC on exports. The application was rejected due to missing BRCs and incomplete supplier ledger and bank statements. The petitioner contested that BRCs were not required and faced rejection over incomplete ledger accounts.
Decision: The court ruled that BRCs are not mandatory for export refund claims. The court found the rejection based on BRCs and Rule 96B was incorrect. The matter was remanded to re-evaluate whether the payments for inward supplies were made properly.
Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Update Logo Sample
Sample

Get above Design
GST Decision by HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Refund Rejection Overturned: BRCs Not Essential for Export ITC Claims
logo

Rajiv Sharma HUF v. Union of India

26-07-2024

W.P. (C) NO. 9381 OF 2023

Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Facts: Rajiv Sharma HUF applied for a refund of accumulated ITC on exports. The application was rejected due to missing BRCs and incomplete supplier ledger and bank statements. The petitioner contested that BRCs were not required and faced rejection over incomplete ledger accounts.
Decision: The court ruled that BRCs are not mandatory for export refund claims. The court found the rejection based on BRCs and Rule 96B was incorrect. The matter was remanded to re-evaluate whether the payments for inward supplies were made properly.
Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Update Logo Sample
Sample

Get above Design
GST Decision by HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Refund Rejection Overturned: BRCs Not Essential for Export ITC Claims
logo

Rajiv Sharma HUF v. Union of India

26-07-2024

W.P. (C) NO. 9381 OF 2023

Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Facts: Rajiv Sharma HUF applied for a refund of accumulated ITC on exports. The application was rejected due to missing BRCs and incomplete supplier ledger and bank statements. The petitioner contested that BRCs were not required and faced rejection over incomplete ledger accounts.
Decision: The court ruled that BRCs are not mandatory for export refund claims. The court found the rejection based on BRCs and Rule 96B was incorrect. The matter was remanded to re-evaluate whether the payments for inward supplies were made properly.
Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Update Logo Sample
Sample

Get above Design






PracticeGuru Copyright - 2019-2025