Facts: The accused was charged with issuing fake invoices through nine firms, enabling GST evasion via wrongful ITC claims. The department claimed these firms were untraceable but provided no conclusive evidence of their non-existence or GST registration cancellations. The accused was in custody for over seven months, while the maximum punishment for the offense was five years, and an investigation against a co-accused was still pending.
Decision: The court deemed the offenses compoundable, triable by a Magistrate and noted the trial would take significant time. Considering prolonged custody and lack of necessity for further detention, the accused was granted bail with conditions, including a bond and sureties. The accused was restricted from leaving India and required to cooperate with the trial and investigation.

Facts: The accused was charged with issuing fake invoices through nine firms, enabling GST evasion via wrongful ITC claims. The department claimed these firms were untraceable but provided no conclusive evidence of their non-existence or GST registration cancellations. The accused was in custody for over seven months, while the maximum punishment for the offense was five years, and an investigation against a co-accused was still pending.
Decision: The court deemed the offenses compoundable, triable by a Magistrate and noted the trial would take significant time. Considering prolonged custody and lack of necessity for further detention, the accused was granted bail with conditions, including a bond and sureties. The accused was restricted from leaving India and required to cooperate with the trial and investigation.

Facts: The accused was charged with issuing fake invoices through nine firms, enabling GST evasion via wrongful ITC claims. The department claimed these firms were untraceable but provided no conclusive evidence of their non-existence or GST registration cancellations. The accused was in custody for over seven months, while the maximum punishment for the offense was five years, and an investigation against a co-accused was still pending.
Decision: The court deemed the offenses compoundable, triable by a Magistrate and noted the trial would take significant time. Considering prolonged custody and lack of necessity for further detention, the accused was granted bail with conditions, including a bond and sureties. The accused was restricted from leaving India and required to cooperate with the trial and investigation.

Facts: The accused was charged with issuing fake invoices through nine firms, enabling GST evasion via wrongful ITC claims. The department claimed these firms were untraceable but provided no conclusive evidence of their non-existence or GST registration cancellations. The accused was in custody for over seven months, while the maximum punishment for the offense was five years, and an investigation against a co-accused was still pending.
Decision: The court deemed the offenses compoundable, triable by a Magistrate and noted the trial would take significant time. Considering prolonged custody and lack of necessity for further detention, the accused was granted bail with conditions, including a bond and sureties. The accused was restricted from leaving India and required to cooperate with the trial and investigation.

Facts: The accused was charged with issuing fake invoices through nine firms, enabling GST evasion via wrongful ITC claims. The department claimed these firms were untraceable but provided no conclusive evidence of their non-existence or GST registration cancellations. The accused was in custody for over seven months, while the maximum punishment for the offense was five years, and an investigation against a co-accused was still pending.
Decision: The court deemed the offenses compoundable, triable by a Magistrate and noted the trial would take significant time. Considering prolonged custody and lack of necessity for further detention, the accused was granted bail with conditions, including a bond and sureties. The accused was restricted from leaving India and required to cooperate with the trial and investigation.

Facts: The accused was charged with issuing fake invoices through nine firms, enabling GST evasion via wrongful ITC claims. The department claimed these firms were untraceable but provided no conclusive evidence of their non-existence or GST registration cancellations. The accused was in custody for over seven months, while the maximum punishment for the offense was five years, and an investigation against a co-accused was still pending.
Decision: The court deemed the offenses compoundable, triable by a Magistrate and noted the trial would take significant time. Considering prolonged custody and lack of necessity for further detention, the accused was granted bail with conditions, including a bond and sureties. The accused was restricted from leaving India and required to cooperate with the trial and investigation.