'

Select Design

You can update Firmname, Logo, Profession, Mobile, Email, Address from Profile.

GST Decision by HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
GST Demand Set Aside for School Construction Under Government Contract Due to Non-Speaking Order
logo

Smt Angoori Devi Educational and Cultural Society (Regd.) v. Union of India

12-12-2024

WRIT TAX No. - 1783 of 2024

Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Facts: The Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority granted the petitioner a lease to construct a higher secondary school, with most of the premium already paid, except Rs. 5,97,852/-. A GST demand of Rs. 5,52,31,637/- was raised, which the petitioner claimed was contrary to exemption notifications and an advance ruling. The petitioner argued that the demand was non-speaking, failing to reference any notification removing exemptions or demonstrating non-compliance with exemption conditions.
Decision: The GST demand was set aside as non-speaking and contrary to exemption notifications, advance rulings, and relevant judgments. The respondents were directed to consider relevant notifications and rulings before issuing a fresh speaking order if pursuing GST liability.
Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Update

Get above Design
GST Decision by HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
GST Demand Set Aside for School Construction Under Government Contract Due to Non-Speaking Order
logo

Smt Angoori Devi Educational and Cultural Society (Regd.) v. Union of India

12-12-2024

WRIT TAX No. - 1783 of 2024

Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Facts: The Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority granted the petitioner a lease to construct a higher secondary school, with most of the premium already paid, except Rs. 5,97,852/-. A GST demand of Rs. 5,52,31,637/- was raised, which the petitioner claimed was contrary to exemption notifications and an advance ruling. The petitioner argued that the demand was non-speaking, failing to reference any notification removing exemptions or demonstrating non-compliance with exemption conditions.
Decision: The GST demand was set aside as non-speaking and contrary to exemption notifications, advance rulings, and relevant judgments. The respondents were directed to consider relevant notifications and rulings before issuing a fresh speaking order if pursuing GST liability.
Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Update Logo Sample
Sample

Get above Design

GST Decision by HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
GST Demand Set Aside for School Construction Under Government Contract Due to Non-Speaking Order
logo

Smt Angoori Devi Educational and Cultural Society (Regd.) v. Union of India

12-12-2024

WRIT TAX No. - 1783 of 2024

Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Facts: The Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority granted the petitioner a lease to construct a higher secondary school, with most of the premium already paid, except Rs. 5,97,852/-. A GST demand of Rs. 5,52,31,637/- was raised, which the petitioner claimed was contrary to exemption notifications and an advance ruling. The petitioner argued that the demand was non-speaking, failing to reference any notification removing exemptions or demonstrating non-compliance with exemption conditions.
Decision: The GST demand was set aside as non-speaking and contrary to exemption notifications, advance rulings, and relevant judgments. The respondents were directed to consider relevant notifications and rulings before issuing a fresh speaking order if pursuing GST liability.
Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Update Logo Sample
Sample

Get above Design
GST Decision by HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
GST Demand Set Aside for School Construction Under Government Contract Due to Non-Speaking Order
logo

Smt Angoori Devi Educational and Cultural Society (Regd.) v. Union of India

12-12-2024

WRIT TAX No. - 1783 of 2024

Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Facts: The Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority granted the petitioner a lease to construct a higher secondary school, with most of the premium already paid, except Rs. 5,97,852/-. A GST demand of Rs. 5,52,31,637/- was raised, which the petitioner claimed was contrary to exemption notifications and an advance ruling. The petitioner argued that the demand was non-speaking, failing to reference any notification removing exemptions or demonstrating non-compliance with exemption conditions.
Decision: The GST demand was set aside as non-speaking and contrary to exemption notifications, advance rulings, and relevant judgments. The respondents were directed to consider relevant notifications and rulings before issuing a fresh speaking order if pursuing GST liability.
Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Update Logo Sample
Sample

Get above Design
GST Decision by HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
GST Demand Set Aside for School Construction Under Government Contract Due to Non-Speaking Order
logo

Smt Angoori Devi Educational and Cultural Society (Regd.) v. Union of India

12-12-2024

WRIT TAX No. - 1783 of 2024

Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Facts: The Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority granted the petitioner a lease to construct a higher secondary school, with most of the premium already paid, except Rs. 5,97,852/-. A GST demand of Rs. 5,52,31,637/- was raised, which the petitioner claimed was contrary to exemption notifications and an advance ruling. The petitioner argued that the demand was non-speaking, failing to reference any notification removing exemptions or demonstrating non-compliance with exemption conditions.
Decision: The GST demand was set aside as non-speaking and contrary to exemption notifications, advance rulings, and relevant judgments. The respondents were directed to consider relevant notifications and rulings before issuing a fresh speaking order if pursuing GST liability.
Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Update Logo Sample
Sample

Get above Design
GST Decision by HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
GST Demand Set Aside for School Construction Under Government Contract Due to Non-Speaking Order
logo

Smt Angoori Devi Educational and Cultural Society (Regd.) v. Union of India

12-12-2024

WRIT TAX No. - 1783 of 2024

Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Facts: The Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority granted the petitioner a lease to construct a higher secondary school, with most of the premium already paid, except Rs. 5,97,852/-. A GST demand of Rs. 5,52,31,637/- was raised, which the petitioner claimed was contrary to exemption notifications and an advance ruling. The petitioner argued that the demand was non-speaking, failing to reference any notification removing exemptions or demonstrating non-compliance with exemption conditions.
Decision: The GST demand was set aside as non-speaking and contrary to exemption notifications, advance rulings, and relevant judgments. The respondents were directed to consider relevant notifications and rulings before issuing a fresh speaking order if pursuing GST liability.
Practiceguru Sample Posters - Pl Subscribe
Update Logo Sample
Sample

Get above Design






PracticeGuru Copyright - 2019-2025