FACTS: Writ petitions challenged GST assessment orders for different assessment years. Petitioner claimed input tax credit (ITC) for transactions with Star Agencies. Respondent alleged non-existent trading and issued show cause notices. Petitioner argued violation of natural justice and lack of opportunity to present case.
Decision: Impugned orders showed petitioner's failure to utilize hearing opportunities. Petitioner failed to prove eligibility for ITC or genuineness of transactions. Respondent provided evidence of fake invoices and non-operational premises. The court deemed the petitioner's arguments as factual and appropriate for consideration in an appellate remedy. The writ petitions were dismissed, directing the petitioner to file an appeal within two weeks before the Deputy Commissioner (St), with the possibility of condoning the delay.

FACTS: Writ petitions challenged GST assessment orders for different assessment years. Petitioner claimed input tax credit (ITC) for transactions with Star Agencies. Respondent alleged non-existent trading and issued show cause notices. Petitioner argued violation of natural justice and lack of opportunity to present case.
Decision: Impugned orders showed petitioner's failure to utilize hearing opportunities. Petitioner failed to prove eligibility for ITC or genuineness of transactions. Respondent provided evidence of fake invoices and non-operational premises. The court deemed the petitioner's arguments as factual and appropriate for consideration in an appellate remedy. The writ petitions were dismissed, directing the petitioner to file an appeal within two weeks before the Deputy Commissioner (St), with the possibility of condoning the delay.

FACTS: Writ petitions challenged GST assessment orders for different assessment years. Petitioner claimed input tax credit (ITC) for transactions with Star Agencies. Respondent alleged non-existent trading and issued show cause notices. Petitioner argued violation of natural justice and lack of opportunity to present case.
Decision: Impugned orders showed petitioner's failure to utilize hearing opportunities. Petitioner failed to prove eligibility for ITC or genuineness of transactions. Respondent provided evidence of fake invoices and non-operational premises. The court deemed the petitioner's arguments as factual and appropriate for consideration in an appellate remedy. The writ petitions were dismissed, directing the petitioner to file an appeal within two weeks before the Deputy Commissioner (St), with the possibility of condoning the delay.

FACTS: Writ petitions challenged GST assessment orders for different assessment years. Petitioner claimed input tax credit (ITC) for transactions with Star Agencies. Respondent alleged non-existent trading and issued show cause notices. Petitioner argued violation of natural justice and lack of opportunity to present case.
Decision: Impugned orders showed petitioner's failure to utilize hearing opportunities. Petitioner failed to prove eligibility for ITC or genuineness of transactions. Respondent provided evidence of fake invoices and non-operational premises. The court deemed the petitioner's arguments as factual and appropriate for consideration in an appellate remedy. The writ petitions were dismissed, directing the petitioner to file an appeal within two weeks before the Deputy Commissioner (St), with the possibility of condoning the delay.

FACTS: Writ petitions challenged GST assessment orders for different assessment years. Petitioner claimed input tax credit (ITC) for transactions with Star Agencies. Respondent alleged non-existent trading and issued show cause notices. Petitioner argued violation of natural justice and lack of opportunity to present case.
Decision: Impugned orders showed petitioner's failure to utilize hearing opportunities. Petitioner failed to prove eligibility for ITC or genuineness of transactions. Respondent provided evidence of fake invoices and non-operational premises. The court deemed the petitioner's arguments as factual and appropriate for consideration in an appellate remedy. The writ petitions were dismissed, directing the petitioner to file an appeal within two weeks before the Deputy Commissioner (St), with the possibility of condoning the delay.

FACTS: Writ petitions challenged GST assessment orders for different assessment years. Petitioner claimed input tax credit (ITC) for transactions with Star Agencies. Respondent alleged non-existent trading and issued show cause notices. Petitioner argued violation of natural justice and lack of opportunity to present case.
Decision: Impugned orders showed petitioner's failure to utilize hearing opportunities. Petitioner failed to prove eligibility for ITC or genuineness of transactions. Respondent provided evidence of fake invoices and non-operational premises. The court deemed the petitioner's arguments as factual and appropriate for consideration in an appellate remedy. The writ petitions were dismissed, directing the petitioner to file an appeal within two weeks before the Deputy Commissioner (St), with the possibility of condoning the delay.