In this guide · 10 sections
- "N.A." is a conclusion. SA 230 asks for documentation that lets an experienced auditor with no previous connection with the audit understand the conclusions reached and the significant judgments made — a bare N.A. does neither.
- Every applicability note needs three things: the test (with its source), the figures it was applied to, and the year those figures come from.
- Several tests use the previous year: small company turnover, CSR, internal audit, secretarial audit, the IFC turnover limit, SMC and MSME status. CARO's private-company test uses this year. Mixing them up is an easy error.
- Tests that apply "at any point of time" (CARO and IFC borrowings, internal audit borrowings and deposits) cannot be settled from a year-end trial balance — record the highest balance and where you got it.
- In a work programme, a step marked not applicable should say why — "no inventory held at either year end", not just "N.A."
Try SignReady: What applies to this client — each result with its figures and its section.
Start freeOpen almost any small-company audit file and you will find a row of "N.A." marks: CARO N.A., cash flow N.A., IFC N.A., CSR N.A. Each one is a conclusion that a legal requirement does not apply to this client this year — and in most files there is nothing behind it. If a reviewer asks "why is CARO not applicable?", the answer is in someone's head, or in last year's file, or nowhere. This guide shows how to document each common applicability decision in one line: the test, the figures, the source, and a model working-paper note.
Why "N.A." is not enough
SA 230 requires audit documentation sufficient to enable an experienced auditor, having no previous connection with the audit, to understand the significant matters arising, the conclusions reached on them, and the significant professional judgments made in reaching those conclusions (paragraph 8). Deciding that CARO or internal financial controls reporting does not apply changes what you report in the audit report — that is a conclusion, and an experienced reviewer cannot understand it from two letters.
SA 230 also explains when a requirement is genuinely "not relevant": when the entire standard is not relevant (its example: no internal audit function, so SA 610 is not relevant), or when a requirement is conditional and the condition does not exist (paragraph A19). Both are facts about the client — and facts can be recorded.
A good applicability note records the test (section and limit), the figures compared with it and which year they come from, the evidence (signed statements, trial balance, bank statement, management confirmation), and who concluded and reviewed it, and when.
Small company, cash flow, CARO and IFC
These four depend on each other: small company status drives the cash flow and CARO exemptions and is one route to the IFC exemption.
| Item | The test | Figures to record |
|---|---|---|
| Small company — s.2(85) | A company other than a public company with paid-up capital not exceeding ₹10 crore and turnover not exceeding ₹100 crore (limits under G.S.R. 880(E), 1 December 2025). Never a holding or subsidiary company, a section 8 company or a company governed by a special Act. | Paid-up capital (the Act gives no date; record it at the balance-sheet date and note any allotment in the year); turnover as per the P&L of the immediately preceding financial year; holding / subsidiary position |
| Cash flow statement — s.2(40) proviso | Not required for a One Person Company, small company or dormant company. A private company recognised as a start-up by DPIIT may also omit it (G.S.R. 583(E), 13 June 2017). | The status relied on; for a start-up, the DPIIT recognition and the filing position (below) |
| CARO 2020 — para 1(2) | Excludes banking and insurance companies, section 8 companies, OPCs and small companies, and a private company that is not a holding or subsidiary of a public company and has paid-up capital plus reserves and surplus not more than ₹1 crore at the balance-sheet date, bank / financial institution borrowings not exceeding ₹1 crore at any point of time during the year, and total revenue (including discontinuing operations) not exceeding ₹10 crore | Current year: capital plus reserves at the year end; highest bank / FI borrowing during the year; total revenue; holding / subsidiary position |
| IFC reporting — s.143(3)(i) | Does not apply to a private company that is an OPC or small company, or that has both turnover below ₹50 crore as per the latest audited financial statements and aggregate borrowings from banks, financial institutions or any body corporate below ₹25 crore at any point of time during the year (G.S.R. 583(E), as corrected on 13 July 2017 to read "and" in place of "or") | Which route you rely on; turnover per the latest audited statements; highest borrowings including inter-corporate loans; the ROC filing position |
Two points are easy to miss. First, G.S.R. 583(E) added a condition to all the private company exemptions in the 2015 notification it amended: they apply only to a private company that has not committed a default in filing its financial statements under section 137 or its annual return under section 92. That covers the IFC exemption and the start-up cash flow exemption, so check the MCA filing status and record it. Second, the ICAI Guidance Note on CARO 2020 explains that a fluctuating cash credit counts: if on any day the balance with other bank borrowings exceeded ₹1 crore, the exemption is lost. A year-end trial balance cannot show that — look at the bank statements or the drawing-power statements.
Model notes (illustrative figures):
- "Small company: Yes. Paid-up capital ₹1.5 cr at 31.03.2026 (limit ₹10 cr, G.S.R. 880(E)); turnover FY 2024-25 ₹38.2 cr per signed P&L (limit ₹100 cr); not a holding or subsidiary — register of members and MRL. s.2(85)."
- "CARO 2020: N.A. — small company (para 1(2)(iv)). See small-company note."
- "IFC reporting: N.A. — private company, small company (G.S.R. 583(E), entry 9A). No default in AOC-4 / MGT-7 filings — MCA master data seen on [date]."
- "Cash flow: not included — small company, s.2(40) proviso."
CSR, internal audit, secretarial audit and Ind AS
For most small-firm clients these are all "no", which is why they often get ticked without a figure. Each tests the previous year (or the latest audited statements), so the note should quote last year's numbers.
| Item | The test | Year of the figures |
|---|---|---|
| CSR — s.135(1) | Net worth ₹500 crore or more, turnover ₹1,000 crore or more, or net profit ₹5 crore or more | Immediately preceding financial year. Net profit is not the P&L profit before tax — it is worked out under section 198 (section 135 and the CSR Rules both say so), so a company near ₹5 crore needs the calculation, not the PBT |
| Internal auditor — s.138, Companies (Accounts) Rules r.13 | Listed companies; unlisted public companies with paid-up capital ₹50 crore or more, turnover ₹200 crore or more, bank / public financial institution borrowings above ₹100 crore at any point, or deposits ₹25 crore or more at any point; private companies with turnover ₹200 crore or more or such borrowings above ₹100 crore at any point | Preceding financial year |
| Secretarial audit — s.204, Managerial Personnel Rules r.9 | Listed companies; public companies with paid-up capital ₹50 crore or more or turnover ₹250 crore or more; any company with outstanding loans or borrowings from banks or public financial institutions of ₹100 crore or more | As existing on the last date of the latest audited financial statements |
| Ind AS — Ind AS Rules 2015 r.4 | Companies listed or being listed (not on an SME exchange); unlisted companies with net worth ₹250 crore or more; their holding, subsidiary, joint venture or associate companies | A company crossing the net worth limit for the first time at a year end applies Ind AS from the next accounting year |
Model note: "CSR, internal audit, secretarial audit, Ind AS: none applies. FY 2024-25 (signed): net worth ₹6.1 cr, turnover ₹38.2 cr, PBT ₹0.9 cr; bank borrowings highest ₹2.4 cr (cash credit statement); unlisted private company, not part of an Ind AS group (MRL). s.135(1); r.13; r.9; Ind AS Rules r.4." One line, four conclusions.
SignReady's "What applies to this client" works out small company, cash flow, CARO, IFC, CSR, internal and secretarial audit, Ind AS, AS level and tax audit from your answers and the trial balances — each result with the figures and the section it rests on.
Tax audit for FY 2025-26
The Income-tax Act, 2025 applies from tax year 2026-27. Accounts for FY 2025-26 are still audited under section 44AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961, so cite that section for this season's files.
- Business: audit if total sales, turnover or gross receipts exceed ₹1 crore. The limit is ₹10 crore where cash receipts do not exceed 5% of total receipts and cash payments do not exceed 5% of total payments — both conditions, for the whole year.
- Profession: audit if gross receipts exceed ₹50 lakh.
- Presumptive schemes (44AD, 44ADA, 44AE): the answer depends on the scheme, the entity's eligibility and the profit rate declared — record all three.
Model note: "Tax audit u/s 44AB(a), IT Act 1961: required. Turnover FY 2025-26 ₹3.4 cr (exceeds ₹1 cr); cash receipts 7.8% of total receipts, so the ₹10 cr limit is not available (working at W/P T-2)." Where you rely on the ₹10 crore limit, keep the working that shows both percentages.
Accounting Standards for firms, LLPs and proprietors
For accounting periods beginning on or after 1 April 2024, ICAI classifies non-company entities as either MSMEs or Large entities (replacing the earlier four levels). An MSME is not listed or in the process of listing, not a bank, financial institution or insurer, has turnover (excluding other income) not exceeding ₹250 crore in the immediately preceding accounting year, has had no borrowings above ₹50 crore at any time in that year, and is not a holding or subsidiary of a non-MSME.
- AS 3, AS 17, AS 20 and AS 24 do not apply to any MSME.
- AS 18 and AS 28 also do not apply where preceding-year turnover is up to ₹50 crore and borrowings never exceeded ₹10 crore in that year (and the entity is not a holding or subsidiary of an MSME outside those limits).
- An entity that becomes an MSME after being Large gets the relaxations only after it has been an MSME for two consecutive years.
- An MSME that uses the relaxations must disclose in a note that it is an MSME and has complied with the Standards as applicable to an MSME.
Model note: "AS level: MSME (ICAI criteria, periods from 1.4.2024). FY 2024-25 turnover ₹18.6 cr, highest borrowings ₹4.1 cr; not listed, not part of a large group. AS 3, 17, 18, 20, 24, 28 not applied; MSME note given at Note 1."
Which year's figures?
Often the slip is not the limit but the year. A quick reference:
| Test | Figures from |
|---|---|
| Small company — turnover | Preceding year's P&L |
| CARO private-company test | Current year: balance-sheet date, during the year, total revenue for the year |
| IFC exemption — turnover / borrowings | Latest audited statements / at any point during the current year |
| CSR, internal audit | Preceding financial year |
| Secretarial audit | Last date of the latest audited statements |
| Ind AS net worth | Crossed at a year end — applies from the next year |
| MSME status (non-company entities) | Preceding accounting year |
| Tax audit | Current year turnover or gross receipts |
"Latest audited statements" and "preceding year" are usually the same accounts — but not for a first-year company or a client whose previous audit is still unsigned. In those files, write the year into the note.
"Not applicable" steps in the work programme
The same applies inside the audit programme. Under SA 230 paragraph A19, a step is not relevant only when the area does not exist or its condition is absent. So:
- Write the fact, not the label. "No inventory at either year end — service business" or "No borrowings in either trial balance", not "N.A."
- Do not delete the step. Leave it in the programme with the reason, so a reviewer can see it was considered and not forgotten.
- Reopen it when the facts change. If a revised trial balance brings in a term loan, the borrowings steps become relevant again.
- Distinguish "done elsewhere" from "not applicable". A GST reconciliation filed with the tax audit working is done, not N.A. — say where it is filed.
- Have the reviewer look at the N.A. column. It is the shortest part of the programme to review, and an omission recorded as N.A. is easy to miss.
Do it fresh every year
Applicability is a decision for each year, on that year's figures. A company that was small last year may not be this year, and the limits themselves change — the small company limits have been raised three times since 2021. Copying last year's N.A. column is an easy way to claim an exemption that has lapsed. Write the figures each year, and the note checks itself.
Try SignReady: Differ from a result? Record your decision and the reason, shown in the file.
Start freeFrequently asked questions
Is it enough to write "N.A." against CARO in the audit file?
It is better to record why. SA 230 requires documentation that lets an experienced auditor with no previous connection with the audit understand the conclusions reached and significant judgments made. A one-line note with the exemption relied on (for example, small company under para 1(2)(iv)) and the figures supporting it does this; a bare N.A. does not.
Which year's turnover decides small company status?
Section 2(85) tests turnover as per the profit and loss account for the immediately preceding financial year. Paid-up capital has no stated date in the Act; record it at the balance-sheet date and note any allotment during the year.
Does the IFC exemption for private companies have any condition?
Yes. G.S.R. 583(E) (13 June 2017) provides that the exemptions in the notification apply only to a private company that has not committed a default in filing its financial statements under section 137 or its annual return under section 92. Record the filing position along with the route you rely on: OPC or small company, or turnover below ₹50 crore and borrowings below ₹25 crore (both tests must be met, after the corrigendum of 13 July 2017).
Can CARO borrowings be checked from the year-end trial balance?
Not reliably. The test is borrowings from banks or financial institutions exceeding ₹1 crore at any point of time during the year, and the ICAI Guidance Note on CARO 2020 explains that a fluctuating cash credit balance counts if it crossed the limit on any day. Check the bank statements or drawing-power statements and record the highest balance.
Which Income-tax Act applies to tax audits for FY 2025-26?
The Income-tax Act, 1961 — section 44AB. The Income-tax Act, 2025 applies from tax year 2026-27 onwards.
Sources
- ICAI — SA 230 Audit Documentation (paras 8, A19)
- Companies Act, 2013 — sections 2(40), 2(85), 135, 138, 143(3)(i), 204 (India Code)
- Small company limits — G.S.R. 880(E), 1 December 2025 (Gazette)
- Exemptions to private companies — G.S.R. 583(E), 13 June 2017 (Gazette)
- Corrigendum to G.S.R. 583(E) — S.O. 2218(E), 13 July 2017 ("statement or" read as "statement and")
- CARO 2020 — paragraph 1(2); ICAI Guidance Note on CARO 2020 (Revised 2022 Edition)
- Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 — rule 13
- Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014 — rule 9, as amended by G.S.R. 13(E), 3 January 2020
- Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015 — rule 4
- ICAI — Revised criteria for classification of non-company entities (periods from 1 April 2024)
- Income-tax Act, 1961 — section 44AB
In SignReady, a partner who differs from a worked-out result records the decision with a reason, which is shown in the file; work programme steps that do not fit the client are marked "Not relevant" with the reason. First 3 finalisations free.
Audit and accounts updates, practical tips and knowledge: join the Audit and Accounts Update group on WhatsApp.
Version history: 11 Oct 2026 — first published.



